1652An elegant and learned discourse of the light of nature, with several other treatises: By Nathanael Culverwel London, printed by T.R. and E.M. for John Rothwell. 1652. [16], 212 p. 4o. A source for Lockes early views on ethics and natural law. Wing C7569 Reprint: edited by Robert A. Greene and Hugh MacCallum. Toronto ; Buffalo : University of Toronto Press c1971. lv, 216 p. (University of Toronto Department of English studies and texts ; 17). For the introduction to this edition, see entry under 1971. 1659Syntagma philosophiae Epicuri, cum refutationibus dogmatum quae contra fidem Christianum ab eo asserta sunt, oppositis per Petrum Gassendum Praefigitus Samuel Sorberii dissertatio De vita ac moribus Petri Gassendi. Hagæ-Comitis, ex typographia Adriani Vlacq, 1659. [50], 495, [1] p. 4o. C 115 1662La logique, ou Lart de penser: A Paris, chez Charles Savreux. 1662. 243, [7] p. 12o. Many editions; Locke owned a copy of the 4th French ed., 1674, and of the Latin ed. of 1674. English translations: (1) Logic; or, The art of thinking: London, printed by H. Sawbridge, 1685. [8], 250, 247, [9] p. 8o; and (2) The art of thinking : Port-Royal logic / Antoine Arnauld ; translated, with an introduction, by James Dickoff and Patricia James ; and a foreword by Charles W. Hendel. Indianapolis : Bobbs-Merrill, c1964. lx, 378 p. (The Library of liberal arts ; 144) H&L 1803, 1803a; Wing A3723 1665Scepsis scientifica: or, Confest ignorance, the way to science; By Joseph Glanvill London: printed by E. Cotes, for Henry Eversden. 1665. [36], 184, [16], 92 p. 8o. Wing G827 1666The origine of formes and qualities, (according to the corpuscular philosophy,) illustrated by considerations and experiments, (written formerly by way of notes upon an essay about nitre). By the Honourable Robert Boyle Oxford, printed by H. Hall Printer to the University, for Ric: Davis. An.Dom. 1666. [50], 433, [1] p. 8o. The theoretical part reprinted with Barger, Locke on substance (1976) H&L 413; Wing B4014; C 13 1672Essais de morale, contenus en divers traittez sur plusieurs devoirs importans. A Paris, chez le veuve Charles Savreux. 1672. 2 vols. 12o. Unverified. Nouvelle édition, revuë & corrigée. Suivant la copie imprimée à Paris, chez le veuve Charles Savreux. 1672. 2 vols. 12o. H&L 2040a; A [783] 1674Abregé de la philosophie de Gassendi. Par F. Bernier A Paris, chez Jacques Langlois, et Emmanuel Langlois. 1674. [10], 509, [1], lxxi, [1] p. 12o. Reprinted: A Lyon, chez Anisson, & Posuel. 1678. 8 vol. 12o; Locke owned a copy of this edition. H&L 283; C 115 De la recherche de la verité. Ou lon traitte de la nature, de lesprit, de lhomme, & de lusage quil en doit faire pour éviter lerreur dans les sciences. A Paris: chez A. Pralard. 1674-75. 2 vol. 12o. Many editions; Locke owned copies of several. English translations: (1) Malebranches Search after truth. Or a treatise of the nature of the humane mind. And of its management for avoiding error in the sciences. Done out of French from the last edition. London, printed for J. Dunton, and S. Manship, 1694-1695. 2 vol. 8o. Translation by Richard Sault; (2) Father Malebranches Treatise concerning the search after truth. All translated by T. Taylor Oxford, printed by L. Lichfield, for Thomas Bennet, bookseller, London. 1694. [16], 203, [1], 42 p. 2o; and (3) The search after truth / Nicolas Malebranche ; translated from the French by Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp. Columbus : Ohio State University Press, c1980. xxxii, 861 p. H&L 1875, 1876, 1883, 1883a; Wing M315-317; C 30 1678Organum vetus & novum. Or, A discourse of reason and truth. Wherein the natural logick common to mankinde is briefly and plainly described. By Richard Burthogge, M.D. London: printed for Sam. Crouch. 1678. [4], 73, [1] p. 8o. Wing B6154 1678Des vrayes et des fausses idées contra ce quenseigne lauteur de La recherche de la verité. Par M. Antoine Arnauld A Cologne, chez Nicolas Schouten, 1683. [6], 339, [1] p. 12o. H&L 124 1684Meditationes de cognitione, veritate, & ideis / per G.G.L. // IN: Acta eruditorum. Anno 1684:537-542. C 55 1685Logic; or, The art of thinking: See entry for original French text (1662) 1690An essay concerning human understanding [review] . // IN: Bibliotheque universelle et historique pour lannée 1690. Tome 17:399-427. Review and summary of Locke Essay (1690) [Locke #228], including extracts. C 56-57; Y&Y 1690.3 Cursory reflections upon a book calld, An essay concerning human understanding. Written by John Norris In a letter to a friend. London, printed for S. Manship, 1690. [2], 44, [2] p. 8o. Reprinted in 1692, 1694, 1699, 1713, 1724, 1728, and 1961; issued with various publications by Norris, including: 1 Christian blessedness: or, Discourses upon the beatitudes of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Written by John Norris London, printed for S. Manship, 1690. 2 Christian blessedness The second edition. London, printed for S. Manship, 1692. 3 Practical discourses upon the beatitudes of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. The third edition. London: printed for S. Manship, 1699. 4 Practical discourses upon the beatitudes of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. The fourth edition. London: printed for S. Manship, 1699. 5 Practical discourses upon the beatitudes of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. The fifth edition. London: printed for S. Manship, 1707. 6 A philosophical discourse concerning the natural immortality of the soul, wherein the great question of the souls immortality is endeavourd to be righly stated, and full[y] cleard London: printed for S. Manship, 1708. 7 Christian blessedness The tenth edition. London: printed for Edmund Parker. 1724. 8 Reflections upon the conduct of human life The fifth edition. London: printed for Edmund Parker, 1724. Pages 255-296. 9 Practical discourses upon the beatitudes of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. The fifteenth edition. London: printed for Edmund Parker. 1728. Reprinted, with an introduction by Gilbert D. McEwen. Los Angeles : William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1961. 5, 45 p. (Publication / Augustan Reprint Society ; no. 93); also reprinted in Astell & Norris, Letters concerning the love of God (2005). p. 184-198. Reviewed by Le Clerc, Cursory reflections &c. (1691); an English translation of this review appeared in The supplement to the third volume of the Athenian gazette. London, printed for John Dunton, 1691. 8o. Pages 2-3. Norris added a reply to subsequent editions of Cursory reflections: A brief consideration of the remarques made upon the foregoing Reflections by the gentlemen of the Athenian Society, in the supplement to the third volume, &c. Norris was also criticized by Lady Masham (1696); in 1699, Norris added An admonition concerning two late books, calld Discourses of the love of God to Cursory reflections. Locke did not publish any response to Norris; however, he did draft an Answer to Mr. Norriss reflections; the posthumous Examination of P. Malebranches opinion of seeing all things in God [Locke #775] was directed at Norris, as were Remarks upon some of Mr. Norriss books [Locke #789] H&L 2094 [1692 ed.]; Wing N1246, 1247, 1260; C 29-30; Y&Y 1690.2, 1692.1; A [435]; T 218, 220 [1708] Reflections upon the conduct of human life: with reference to the study of learning and knowledge. In a letter to the excellent lady, the Lady Masham. By John Norris London, printed for S. Manship. 1690. [8], 196, [4] p. 8o. Also: 2nd ed., 1691; Norriss reference in the preface to Lady Mashams blindness initiated his quarrel with Lady Masham and Locke. C 32 1691[Anonymous]. An essay concerning humane understanding [review]. // IN: Acta eruditorum. Anno 1691:501-505. Review Locke Essay (1690) [Locke #228]. Cursory reflections &c. [review]. // IN: Bibliotheque universelle et historique de lannée 1691. Tome 20:65-72. Review of Norris, Cursory reflections (1690) [#01104]; translated into English as: Cursory reflections on a book entitled, An essay about understanding [review]. // IN: The supplement to the third volume of the Athenian gazette. London, printed for John Dunton, 1691. 8o. Pages 2-3. Norris added a reply to subsequent editions of Cursory reflections: A brief consideration of the remarques made upon the foregoing Reflections by the gentlemen of the Athenian Society, in the supplement to the third volume, &c. 1692Ontologia; sive De ente in genere. Auctore, Joane Clerico. Londini, impensis Awnsham & Johan. Churchill. 1692. [8], 200, [2] p. 12o. Forms vol. 2 of his Logica: sive Ars ratiocinandi; dedicated to Locke. H&L 764; Wing L821 A brief disquisition of the law of nature, according to the principles laid down in the reverend Dr. Cumberlands (now Lord Bishop of Peterboroughs) Latin treatise on that subject See entry in Chapter 7. 1694An essay upon reason, and the nature of spirits. By Richard Burthogge London: printed for John Dunton. 1694. [6], 280 p. 8o. See dedication To the learned Mr. John Lock, author of the Essay concerning human understanding (sig. A3-4) Review: [R. Wooley], An essay upon reason (1694) H&L 538; Wing B6150; C 35; T 188 G.G.L. De primæ philosophiæ emendatione, & de notione substantiæ. // IN: Acta eruditorum. Anno 1694:110-112. C 55 A discourse concerning the nature of man, both in his natural and political capacity: both as he is a rational creature, and member of a civil society. With an examination of some of Mr. Hobbss opinions relating hereunto. By Ja. Lowde London, printed by T. Warren, for Walter. Kettilby, 1694. 8o. See Ch. 3, Of natural notions of truth and goodness (p. 49-94) Locke added a reply to Lowde to the Epistle to the Reader in the 2nd edition of the Essay [Locke #229] H&L 1813; Wing L3299; C 27, 32-33; Y&Y 1694.1; A [436] An essay upon reason and the existence of spirits. By Richard Burthogge [review]. // IN: The compleat library: containing an historical account of the choicest books newly printed in England and in the forreign journals. Vol. 3 (1694):107-112. Review of Burthugge, An essay upon reason (1694) Reflections upon ancient and modern learning. By William Wotton London, printed by J. Leake, for Peter Buck, 1694. 8o. See Ch. 13, Of the logick and metaphysicks of the ancient Greeks (p. 154-158) H&L 3187a; Wing W3658 1695Specimen dynamicum, pro admirandis naturæ legibus circa corporum vires & mutuas actiones detegendis, & adsuas causas revocandis, autore G.G.L. // IN: Acta eruditorum. Anno 1695:145-157. C 55 1696Some considerations touching the Trinity: and the ways of managing that controversie. London, printed; and sold by E. Whitlock. 1696. [10], 52 p. 4o. H&L 2991; Wing G303 A discourse concerning the love of God. London, printed for A[w]nsham and John Churchil, 1696. [6], 126 p. 12o. Contains a reply to Norris, Practical discourses , vol. 3 (1693) French translation: Discours sur lamour divin, où lon explique ce que cest, & où lon fait voir les mauvaises conséquences des explications tro subtiles que lon en donne. Traduit de langlois. Par Pierre Coste. A Amsterdam, chez Pierre de Coup. 1715. [26], 268 p. 12o. Avertissement du traducteur dated 6 janvier 1705. H&L 1812; Wing M905; C 32 A discourse in vindication of the doctrine of the Trinity: with an answer to the late Socinian objections against it from Scripture, antiquity and reason. By the Right Reverend Father in God, Edward, Lord Bishop of Worcester. London, printed by J.H. for Henry Mortlock, 1697. [2], lxii, [4], 292 p. 8o. The title page to the contrary, this was published before the end of 1696. See Ch. 10, The objections against the Trinity in point of reason answerd (p. 230-292); reprinted in [1] Stillingfleet, Three criticisms of Locke (1987); and [2] Schwitzgebel, Edward Stillingfleet als Kritiker der Ideenlehre John Lockes (2000). p. 140-168). Also: The second edition. London, printed by J.H. for Henry Mortlock, 1697. lxii, [4], 292 p. 8o; also reprinted in The philosophy of Edward Stillingfleet : including his replies to John Locke / edited and introduced by G.A.J. Rogers. Bristol : Thoemmes Press, 2000. Vol. 4. Review: Anon., A discourse (1698) H&L 2787; Wing S5585-6; C 35-37; Y&Y 1696.7; A [439] 1697[Authorship uncertain] Remarks upon An essay concerning humane understanding: in a letter addressd to the author. London, printed for M. Wootton. 1697. 15, [1] p. 4o. Traditionally attributed to Thomas Burnet, author of The sacred theory of the earth; however, Walmsley, Craig & Burrows, “The authorship of the Remarks …” (2016) cast doubt on the attribution and suggest that Richard Willis (author of The occasional paper) is a more likely author. Locke appended an Answer to his Reply to Stillingfleet [Locke #443]; also answered in Cockburn, A defence of the Essay (1702) Reprinted (with the other Remarks and Lockes replies): New York : Garland, 1984 and Doncaster : Brynmill, 1989. H&L 1794; Wing B5944; C44-45; Y&Y 1697.4; A [448] [Authorship uncertain] Second remarks upon An essay concerning humane understanding, in a letter addressd to the author. Being a vindication of the first Remarks, against the answer of Mr. Lock, at the end of his Reply to the Lord Bishop of Worcester. London, printed for W. Wotton. 1697. [2], 30 p. 4o. Traditionally attributed to Thomas Burnet, author of The sacred theory of the earth; however, Walmsley, Craig & Burrows, “The authorship of the Remarks …” (2016) cast doubt on the attribution and suggest that Richard Willis (author of The occasional paper) is a more likely author. Reprinted (with the other Remarks and Lockes replies): New York : Garland, 1984 and Doncaster : Brynmill, 1989. H&L 1795; Wing B5946; C 45-46; Y&Y 1697.5; A [449] A refutation of some of the false conceits in Mr. Lockes Essay concerning human understanding. Together with a brief answer (in Latine) to the argumentation of Gerardus de Vries against the innate idea of God. By Edmund Elys London: printed for, and sold by Will. Marshal, and John Marshal. 1697. 30, [4] p. 8o. Reprinted in Observations on several books (1700) H&L 1038; Wing2 E692A; Y&Y 1697.8; A [450] Solid philosophy asserted, against the fancies of the idealists: or, The method to science farther illustrated. With reflexions on Mr. Lockes Essay concerning human understanding. London, printed for Roger Clavil, Abel Roper, and Thomas Metcalf, 1697. [52], 460, [24] p. 8o. Locke annotated his copy of Sergeant; the notes were published in J.W. Yolton, Lockes unpublished marginal replies to John Sergeant (1951). Reprinted: New York : Garland, 1984. (The philosophy of John Locke) H&L 2626; Wing S2594; C 43-44; Y&Y 1697.12; A [451]; T 228 [1984] The Bishop of Worcesters answer to Mr. Lockes letter, concerning some passages relating to his Essay of humane understanding, mentiond in the late discourse in vindication of the Trinity. With a postscript in answer to some reflections made on that treatise in a late Socinian pamphlet. London, printed by J.H. for Henry Mortlock, 1697. 154, [2] p. 8o. Reviewed (with Lockes Letter ): Anon., A letter to the Bishop of Worcester The Bishop of Worcesters answer (1699) Reprinted (1) in Stillingfleet, Three criticisms of Locke (1987); (2) with Stillingfleets Answer to Mr. Lockes second letter. See entry under 2000; (3) in Schwitzgebel, Edward Stillingfleet als Kritiker der Ideenlehre John Lockes (2000). p. 140-168); and in The philosophy of Edward Stillingfleet : including his replies to John Locke / edited and introduced by G.A.J. Rogers. Bristol : Thoemmes Press, 2000. Vol. 5. H&L 2789; Wing S5557; C 38-40; Y&Y 1697.13; A [442] 1698[Anonymous]. A discourse in vindication of the doctrine of the Trinity &c. [review]. // IN: Acta eruditorum. Anno 1698:496-509. Review of Stillingfleet, A discourse (1697) C 57 A free but modest censure of the late controversial writings and debates of the Lord Bishop of Worcester and Mr. Locke: Mr. Edwards and Mr. Locke: the Hon[oura]ble Charles Boyle, Esq; and Dr. Bentley. Together with brief remarks on Monsieur Le Clercs Ars critica. By F.B., M.A. of Cambridge. London: printed for A. Baldwin, 1698. 31, [1] p. 4o. Sides with Lockes critics. H&L 159a; Wing B59; C 42-43; Y&Y 1698.2; A [452] The grounds and foundation of natural religion, discoverd, in the principal branches of it, in opposition to the prevailing notions of the modern Scepticks and Latitudinarians. By Thomas Beconsall London: printed by W.O. for A. Roper, A. Bosvile; and G. West, in Oxford. 1698. [2], xi, vi, [45], 256, [2] p. 8o. H&L 251a; Wing B1657; C 49-50; Y&Y 1698.3; A [453] The reasonableness and certainty of the Christian religion. By Robert Jenkin London, printed for Peter Buck, 1698. [8], lix, [13], 471, [1] p. 8o. Cites Locke on thinking matter (p. xlvi-xlvii) Also: The second edition, enlarged. London, printed for P.B. and R. Wellington, 1700. 2 vols. 8o. See vol. 1:xxix-xxx. Wing J570-571; C 50; A [454] The Bishop of Worcesters answer to Mr. Lockes second letter; wherein his notion of ideas is provd to be inconsistent with it self, and with the articles of the Christian faith. London, printed by J.H. for Henry Mortlock, 1698. 178, [6] p. 8o. Dated: Worcester Sept. 22, 1697. Reviewed (with Lockes Reply ): Anon., Mr. Lockes reply &c. The Bishop of Worcesters answer &c. (1699) Reprinted [1] in Stillingfleet, Three criticisms of Locke (1987); [2] (with Stillingfleets Answer to Mr. Lockes [first] letter). See entry under 2000; [3] in Schwitzgebel, Edward Stillingfleet als Kritiker der Ideenlehre John Lockes (2000). p. 140-168); and in The philosophy of Edward Stillingfleet : including his replies to John Locke / edited and introduced by G.A.J. Rogers. Bristol : Thoemmes Press, 2000. Vol. 5. H&L 2790; Wing S5558; C 41-42; Y&Y 1698.5; A [444] 1699[Anonymous]. A letter to the Bishop of Worcester The Bishop of Worcesters answer [review]. // IN: Acta eruditorum. Anno 1699:12-19. Review of Lockes Letter (1697) [Locke #440] and Stillingfleet, Answer (1697) C 57; Y&Y 1699.4 [Anonymous]. Mr. Lockes reply &c. The Bishop of Worcesters answer &c. [review]. // IN: Acta eruditorum. Anno 1699:19-20. Review of Locke, Reply (1697) [Locke #443] and Stillingfleet, Answer (1699) C 57; Y&Y 1699.4 [Anonymous]. The sceptical muse: or, A paradox on humane understanding. A poem London: printed for R. Basset, and sold by Fr. Hicks, bookseller in Cambridge, 1699. [2], 10 p. 2o. Wing S847 [Authorship uncertain] Third remarks upon An essay concerning humane understanding: in a letter addressd to the author. London, printed for W. Wotton, 1699. 27, [1] p. 4o. Locke annotated his copy of Burnets book, which is in the Yale University Library; the notes were published in Porter, Marginalia Locke-a-na (1887) Traditionally attributed to Thomas Burnet, author of The sacred theory of the earth; however, Walmsley, Craig & Burrows, “The authorship of the Remarks …” (2016) cast doubt on the attribution and suggest that Richard Willis (author of The occasional paper) is a more likely author. Reprinted (with the other Remarks and Lockes replies): New York : Garland, 1984 and Doncaster : Brynmill, 1989. H&L 1799; Wing B5955; C 46-47; Y&Y 1699.2; A [456] Mr. Lockes reply to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Worcesters Answer to his second letter [review]. // IN: Nouvelles de la république des lettres, par Jaques Bernard. Mois doctobre 1699:363-385; mois de novembre 1699:483-513. Review of Locke, Reply (1699) [Locke #445] C 57; Y&Y 1699.5 Some considerations on the principal objections and arguments which have been publishd against Mr. Locks Essay of humane understanding. By Samuel Bold London: printed for A. and J. Churchill. 1699. [4], 60 p. 8o. Reply to Beconsall, Grounds and foundation of natural religion (1698) and Jenkins The reasonableness and certainty of the Christian religion (1698); reprinted in Bolds Collection (1706) H&L 384; Wing B3494; C 50-51; Y&Y 1699.1; A [455] Of the soul of the world; and of particular souls. In a letter to Mr. Lock, occasioned by Mr. Keils Reflections upon an essay lately published concerning reason. By the author of that essay London, printed for Daniel Brown. 1699. 46, [2] p. 8o. H&L 541; Wing B6153 The eternal and intrinsick reasons of good and evil. A sermon preachd at the Commencement at Cambridge, on Sunday the 2d day of July, 1699. By John Edwards Cambridge, printed at the University Press, for Edmund Jeffery, 1699. [4], 31, [1] p. 4o. See p. 26-28 (an attack on Locke) Another edition published in 1700. 55, [1] p. 8o. See p. 47-49. H&L 1030; Wing E204-5; A [457] Moral essays; wherein some of Mr. Locks and Monsir. Malbranchs opinions are briefly examind. By Ja. Lowde York, printed by J. White for F. Hildyard, and are to be sold by Brab. Aylmer, and Tho. Bennet, London. 1699. [12], 179, [1] p. 12o. H&L 1814; Wing L3301; C 33-34; Y&Y 1699.3; A [458] 1700[Anonymous]. An account of Mr. Locks religion [review]. // IN: The history of the works of the learned. Or, An impartial account of books lately printed in all parts of Europe. With particular relation to the state of learning in each country. Vol. II. (1700):41-46. Review of Milner, An account of Mr. Locks religion (1700) Essai philosophique concernant lentendement humain [review]. // IN: Histoire des ouvrages des savans, par Mr. Basnage de Beauval. Tome 16 (1700):291-308. Review of Costes translation of the Essay [Locke #349] Essai philosophique concernant lentendement humain [review]. // IN: Nouvelles de la république des lettres, par Jaques Bernard. Mois daoût 1700:123-154. Review of Costes translation of the Essay [Locke #349] C 57; Y&Y 1700.3 [Elys, E.] Observations on several books London: printed for, and sold by Will. Marshal, 1700. 8o. Contains A letter to Mr. John Lock. Decemb.16.1699 (p. 7-8) and A refutation of some of the false conceits in Mr. Locks Essays [sic] concerning humane understanding [a reprint of item published in 1697] (p. 9-25). Wing E682A; LNL 5:20; A [459] Essay philosophique concernant lentendement humain = Philosophischer Versuch betressend den menschlichen Verstand [review]. // IN: Monathlicher Auszug. September 1700:611-636. Review of Costes translation of the Essay [Locke #349] C 56; Y&Y 1700.1 An account of Mr. Locks religion, out of his own writings, and in his own words. Together with some observations upon it, and a twofold appendix. I. A specimen of Mr. Locks way of answering authors, out of his Essay, l.1.c.3. where he takes upon his to examine some of Lord Herberts principles. II. A brief enquiry whether Socinianism be justly charged upon Mr. Lock. London, printed; and sold by J. Nutt. 1700. [4], 188 p. 8o. Review: Anon., Hist.Wks.Learned (1700); Anon., Mémoires (Trevoux) [1725] H&L 1802b; Wing M2075; C 69-70; Y&Y 1700.2; A [460] A paraphrase and commentary upon all the Epistles of the New Testament. See entry in Chapter 5. 1701[Anonymous]. Essai philosophique concernant lentendement humain 1700 [review]. // IN: Mémoires pour lhistoire des sciences & des beaux arts (Trevoux). Jan.-Fev. 1701:116-131. Review of Costes translation of the Essay [Locke #349] [Anonymous]. A free discourse concerning truth and error &c. [review]. // IN: Acta eruditorum. Anno 1701:397-405. Review of Edwards, A free discourse (1701) A free discourse concerning truth and error, expecially in matters of religion. Wherein are propounded the proper and certain methods of finding and obtaining the one, and of discovering and avoiding the other. By John Edwards London: printed for Jonathan Robinson, Daniel Brown, Andrew Bell and John Wyat, 1701. xlviii, 483, [1] p. 8o. Defends innate ideas (p. 28ff) Review: Anon., A free discourse (1701) A [461] An essay towards the theory of the ideal or intelligible world. Designd for two parts. The first considering it absolutely in it self, and the second in relation to human understanding. By John Norris London: printed for S. Manship; and W. Hawes. 1701-1704. [8], xvi, 452, [12]; [32], 574, [2] p. 8o. See esp. Pt. 2, Ch. VII, That the ideas whereby we perceive such objects as are mediately intelligible, do not come from those objects; with some occasional considerations upon the intellectus agens of the Schools, Mr. Locks principle of sensation, and that Scholaskick maxim, that there is nothing in the understanding but what was first in the sense (v. 2:329-375) Reprinted: New York : Garland, 1978. (British philosophers and theologians of the 17th & 18th centuries) C 30; Y&Y 1701.1, 1704.1; A [462]; T 219 [1978] 1702[Anonymous]. De intellectu humano [review]. // IN: Acta eruditorum. Anno 1702:357-362. Review of the Latin translation of the Essay [Locke #421] A defence of the Essay of human understanding, written by Mr. Lock. Wherein its principles with reference to morality, reveald religion, and the immortality of the soul, are considerd and justifyd: in answer to Some remarks on that Essay. London, printed for Will. Turner, and John Nutt. 1702. [8], 70 p. 8o. Reply to Burnet, Remarks upon An essay (1697); another edition: [6], 80 p. 8o. Reprinted in Cockburn, Works (1751), vol. 1:43-111; reprinted with Italian translation: Difesa del saggio sull’intelletto umano del Sig. Locke / Catharine Trotter Cockburn. – Lugano : Agorà & Co., 2016. – 196 pages. – (I palinsesti di diotima, filosofie e letterate dall’Umanismo al Settecento ; 2). – ISBN 978-88-974-6170-8. – English and Italian on facing pages. H&L 1801; C 48-49; Y&Y 1702.1; A [463] Second thoughts concerning human soul, demonstrating the notion of human soul, as believd to be a spiritual immortal substance, united to human body, to be a plain heathenish invention, and not consonant to the principles of philosophy, reason, or religion London, printed for R. Basset. 1702. [24], 458, [6] p. 8o. Also: The second edition corrected and enlarged. London, printed for A. Baldwin. 1704. C 51-52; A [466] [Emes, T.] Vindiciae mentis. An essay of the being and nature of mind: wherein the distinction of mind and body, the substantiality, personality, and perfection of mind is asserted, and the original of our minds, their present, seperate, and future state, is freely enquir’d into, in order to a more certain foundation for the knowledge of God, and our selves, and the clearing all doubts and objections that have been, or may be made concerning the life and immortality of our souls. In a new method, by a gentleman. … London printed for H. Walwyn … 1702. Unverified. De origine mali. Authore Guilielmo King Dublinii: excudebat Andreas Crook. 1702. [6], 214, [26] p. 8o. Also published: Londini, impensis Benj Tooke, 1702. [4],214,[26]p. 8o; English translation: An essay on the origins of evil. By Dr. William King Translated from the Latin [by E. Law] with large notes To which is prefixd a dissertation [by John Gay] concerning the fundamental principle and immediate criterion of virtue London: printed for W. Thurlbourn, bookseller in Cambridge; and sold by R. Knaplock, J. and J. Knapton, and W. Innis, 1731. lvi, 330, [2] p. 4o. For Gays dissertation, see entry under 1731. H&L 1638; C 108-109; T 208-209 Anti-scepticism: or, Notes upon each chapter of Mr. Locks Essay concerning humane understanding. With an explication of all the particulars of which he treats, and in the same order. In four books. By Henry Lee London: printed for R. Clavel and C. Harper, 1702. [32], 342 p. 2o. Reprinted: New York : Garland, 1984. (The philosophy of John Locke) C 53; Y&Y 1702.2; A [464]; T 211 [1984] Essays on divers weighty & curious subjects. Particularly on Mr. Locks and Mr. Temples notions. Occasionally written in familiar letters to several persons of great worth and learning. By Samuel Parker, Gent. London, printed, and sold by Nic. Cox, 1702. [8], 270 p. 8o. See Letter 1. The doctrine of the identity of the body at the resurrection, vindicated against modern cavils (p. 1-46); Letter 2. Of a cerberus common-wealth (p. 47-55) [dated August 25, 1700 and August 7, 1699, respectively]; and Letter 8, Of the soul (p. 145-184) Answered in Bolds Discourse concerning the resurrection of the same body (1705) Y&Y 1702.3; A [465] 1703Psychologia: or, An account of the nature of the rational soul. By John Broughton London: printed for W.B. for T. Bennet; and A. Bosvile. 1703. [40], 418, [14] p. 8o. Refutation of Coward, Second thoughts concerning human soul (1702) H&L 495; C 52; Y&Y 1703.1; A [467]; T 181 Observations upon a treatise intitled Psychologia: or An account of the nature of the rational soul. Written by John Broughton. 132, 52 p. 4o. // IN: Arguments and replies, in a dispute concerning the nature of the humane soul. Viz. whether the same be immaterial, separately subsisting, and intelligent; or be material, unintelligent, and extinguishable at the death of the person. London: printed in the year. 1703-[1704?] Dated 22 Oct. 1703. H&L 1704; C 52; A [468] 1704Réponse aux questions dun provincial. A Rotterdam, chez Reinier Leers, 1704-1707. See t.4, ch.15 (p.198-227 [esp. 220-223]) Bayles objections are answered by Le Clerc in his review of the 5th edition of the Essay. A [470] The grand essay: or, A vindication of reason, and religion, against the impostures of philosophy. Proving according to those ideas and conceptions of things human understanding is capable of forming to it self. I. That the existence of any immaterial substance is a philosophic imposture, and impossible to be conceived. 2. That all matter has originally created in it, a principle of internal, or self-motion. 3. That matter and motion must be the foundation of thought in men and brutes. To which is added, a brief answer to Mr. Broughtons Psychologia. &c. By W. C. London: printed for P.G. And sold by John Chantry. 1704. [8], 197, [3], 177-248p. 8o. Running title: Immaterial substance a philosophic imposture; see esp. A brief answer ; answer to Broughtons Psychologia; answered in Bolds A discourse concerning the resurrection of the same body H&L 867; A [469] Observations upon a treatise intitled, A discourse concerning the happiness of good men in the next world. By Dr. Sherlock. 115, [1] p. 4o. // IN: Arguments and replies, in a dispute concerning the nature of the humane soul. Viz. whether the same be immaterial, separately subsisting, and intelligent; or be material, unintelligent, and extinguishable at the death of the person. London: printed in the year. 1703-[1704?]. Reply to Sherlocks Discourse (1704) A [472] Joannis Clerici Logica, ontologia, et pneumatologia. Editio quarta. Cantabrigiae, typis Academicis, impensis Awnsham & Johan Churchill, 1704. [12],401,[5]p. 12o. Dedicated to Locke: Doctissimo et acutissimo viro Joanni Lockio S.P.D. Joannes Clericus (sig. A2-3v) T 194 A discourse concerning the happiness of good men, and the punishment of the wicked, in the next world. By William Sherlock London: printed for W. Rogers, 1704. [8], 592 p. 8o. See A digression concerning connate ideas, or inbred knowledge (p. 124-164) Answered by Layton, Observations upon a treatise (1704) and in Bolds Discourse concerning the resurrection of the same body (1705) C 43; Y&Y 1704.4; A [471] 1705[Anonymous]. A philosophick essay concerning ideas, according to Dr. Sherlocks principles. Wherein his notion of them is stated, and his reasonings thereupon examind. In a letter to a friend. London: printed and are to be sold by B. Bragg. 1705. 24 p. 4o. Anonymous work; has been attributed to Robert South and Thomas Burnett, Rector of Throcking. Y&Y 1705.6; A [473] Reprinted: A philosophick essay concerning ideas, according to Dr. Sherlocks principles (1705) / introduction by James G. Buickerood. New York : AMS Press, 1996. (The Augustan reprints ; publication no. 270) Introduction (p. iii-xii) The Christian religion, as professd by a daughter of the Church of England. London, printed by S.H. for R. Wilkin, 1705. [28], 418, [18] p. 8o. See p. 256-7 (defense of Norris from Bolds Discourse) Unverified; source: NUC A [475] Also: 2nd edition (1717); the Appendix contains her comments on Locke; reprinted in Astell & Norris, Letters concenring the love of God (2005). p. 221-258. Unverified. [Bold, S.] A discourse concerning the resurrection of the same body: with two letters concerning the necessary immateriality of created thinking substance London: printed by S. Holt, for A. and J. Churchill, 1705. [12], 206, [2] p. 8o. Reply to Whitbys Paraphrase and commentary (1700) and to Parkers Essays (1702); answered in Astells Christian religion (1705) and in Parkers Letter to Mr. Bold (1707) Includes A discourse concerning the immateriality of the soul [on Cowards Grand essay (1704); dated Sept. 10th. 1703] (p. 95-176) and Remarks on what Mr. Norris has said in his first chapter of The theory of the ideal world p[t]. 2, to demonstrate the immateriality of the soul [dated Sept. 7th. 1704] (p. 177-206) Reprinted in Bolds Collection (1706) C 52-53, 70; Y&Y 1705.1; A [474] Remarks upon Mr. Clarkes sermons, preached at St. Pauls against Hobbs, Spinoza, and other atheists. Wherein tis demonstrated: I. That Mr. C. by the sceptical hypothesis he imploys, absolutely cuts off all possible means of knowing the nature, or of proving the existence of the one only true God, against Hobbs, Spinoza, or any other atheists whatever. II. That in reference to God, or spirits, he reduces humane understanding to the most incurable state of scepticism III. The reasons are produced which convince the author of this paper, that those sermons do rather establish than destroy, do rather confirm than confute Spinozas hypothesis. London: printed for Jonathan Robinson. 1705. [2], 42 p. 4o. Attacked in Collins, An essay concerning the use of reason (1707); defended by Carroll in A letter to Dr. Benjamin Prat (1707) Y&Y 1705.2; A [476]; T 190 The deists manual: or, A rational enquiry into the Christian religion. With some considerations on Mr. Hobbs, Spinosa, the Oracles of reason, Second thoughts, &c. By C. Gildon London, printed for A. Roper; Fran. Coggan; and Geo. Strahan. 1705. [30], xvi, 301, [1], 36 p. 8o. 1706A dissertation upon the tenth chapter of the fourth book of Mr. Lockes Essay, concerning humane understanding. Wherein that authors endeavors to establish Spinozas atheistical hypothesis, more especially in that tenth chapter, are discoverd and confuted. To which is subjoynd; a short account of the sense wherein the titles of, and the reasonings in the following books, are to be understood, viz. The reasonableness of Christianity. Christianity not mysterious. The rights of the Christian Church, &c. As also, how that sense and those reasonings are bottomd, upon the hypothesis establishd in the said Essay of humane understanding. By William Carroll. London: printed by J. Matthews, and are to be sold by John Nutt. 1706. [8], xv, [1], 292 p. 8o. C 106; Y&Y 1706.2; A [477] 1707A letter to the Reverend Dr. Benjamin Prat wherein, the dangerous errors in a late book, intituled, An essay concerning the use of reason in propositions, the evidence whereof depends upon human testimony: are detected, confuted, and gradually deducd from the very basis of all atheism, upon which alone they are bottomd. By William Caroll. London; printed for Richard Snare ...; and sold by the booksellers of London and Westminster. 1707. 24 p. 8o. Attack on Collinss Essay (1707) Y&Y 1707.1; A [479] A second defense of an argument made use of in a letter to Mr. Dodwel, to prove the immateriality and natural immortality of the soul. London, printed by W.B. for James Knapton. 1707. [2], 54 p. 8o. Reply to a work by Anthony Collins. An essay concerning the use of reason in propositions, the evidence whereof depends upon human testimony. London, printed in the year 1707. 56 p. 8o. See p. 40 (a discussion of Carrolls Remarks [1705]); attacked in Carrolls Letter to Dr. Benjamin Prat (1707) and in Wittys Reasonableness of assenting to the mysteries of Christianity (1708) A [478] Reprinted with Collins, A discourse of free-thinking (1713): New York : Garland, 1984. (The philosophy of John Locke) Oeuvres posthumes de Mr. Locke [review]. // IN: Bibliothèque choisie, pour servir de suite à la Bibliothèque universelle. Par Jean Le Clerc. Année 1707. Tome 12 (1707):123-170. Review and extracts translated from Lockes Posthumous works (1706) [Locke #724]; includes extracts from Conduct of the understanding (p. 124-156) and Discourse of miracles (p. 156-169) C 71, 73; Y&Y 1707.2 Remarques sur lEssai concernant lentendement de M. Locke [review]. // IN: Bibliothèque choisie, pour servir de suite à la Bibliothèque universelle. Par Jean Le Clerc. Année 1707. Tome 12 (1707):80-123. Review of the fifth ed. of the Essay (1706) [Locke #232]; includes Sa défense contre Mr. Bayle against Bayle, Réponse aux questions dun provincial [1704] (p. 105-123) C 106; Y&Y 1707.2 An essay towards the improvement of reason; in the pursuit of learning and conduct of life. By Josh. Oldfield. London, printed for T. Parkhurst: J. Robinson; and J. Lawrence, 1707. [48], viii, 424, [16] p. 8o. A letter to Mr. Bold, occasiond by his late discourse concerning the resurrection of the same body. London: Printed for George Sawbridge, 1707. [2], 37, [1] p. Answer to Bolds Discourse (1705) Also issued with: The ecclesiastical histories of Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodorit, faithfully translated and abridged from the originals, by Samuel Parker, Gent. Volume the first. Containing the abridgment of the ten books of Eusebius; and a letter to Mr. Bolde, concerning the resurrection of the same body. The second edition. London: printed for J. Wilford; and T. Jauncy. 1720. C 52-53; A [479A] The first principles of modern Deism confuted. In a demonstration of the immateriality, natural eternity, and immortality of thinking substances in general; and in particular of human souls. London: printed for John Wyat. 1707. [4], xxii, [6], 301, [3] p. 8o. A [480] 1708An answer to Mr. Clarks Third defense of his letter to Mr. Dodwell. London, printed for A. Baldwin. 1708. 94 p. 8o. Judicium sine affectu de duobus adversariis Joh. Lockio & Petro Poireto eorumque pugna de Ratione et fide, pro materia disputationis propositum à Jo. Wolfgangs Jägero Francofurti & Lipsiae, apud Georgium Wilhelmum Kühnen, anno 1708. 56 p. 8o. Comment on Metternich, Fides et ratio collatæ (1708); also issued with: Examen theologiæ novæ Francofurti & Lipsiae, apud Georgium Wilhelmum Kühnen, typis Joh. Adami Reisii, Tubingeus. 1708. 8o.; and as App. 3 (p. 726-795) of Examen theologiæ novæ Editio secunda Tubingæ. Apud Joann-Georgium Cottam. Anno 1719. 8o. C 127; Y&Y 1708.3; A [484] Réflexions de Mr. L------- sur lEssay de lentendement humain de Monsieur Locke. // IN: Some familiar letters between Mr. Locke, and several of his friends (1708) [Locke #806]. p. 196-205. Leibnizs comments were written in 1695, before the publication of the French translation of the Essay (which Leibniz reviewed in Monatliche Auszug in 1700); they were communicated to Locke through Thomas Burnet and William Molyneux and returned by Locke on 10 April 1697; also published in: Recueil de diverses pieces sur la philosophie, la réligion naturelle, lhistoire, les mathématiques, &c. Par Mrs. Leibniz, Clarke, Newton, & autres autheurs célèbres. [Compiled by Pierre Desmaizeaux]. A Amsterdam, chez H. du Sauzet, 1720. Tome 2:143-154; a second edition of this collection was published: A Amsterdam, chez François Changuion, 1740. See Tome 2:299-310. Review of the 1720 collection: Journal des scavans 70 (1721):440-447, 496-499. C 55; Y&Y 1708.4, 1720.2; A [482] Leibniz also drafted (in late 1698?) a review of the Locke-Stillingfleet controversy, which was not published until 1854. He tried (unsuccessfully) to interest Locke in further discussion of their differences. During the first years of the 18th century, he drafted his Nouveau essais sur lentendement humain. After Lockes death, Leibniz lost interest, and his work was not published until 1765. Fides et ratio collatæ, ac suo utraque loco redditae, adversus principia Joannis Lockii. Insertis non paucis quibus revelationis divinæ ac religionis Christianæ capita digniora profundius confirmantur & explicantur. Edidit & præfatus est Petrus Poiret. Amstelædami, ex officina Wetsteniana. 1708. 61, [19], 472, [104] p. 8o. English translation by Mrs. Hungerford: Faith and reason compared; shewing that divine faith and natural reason proceed from two different and distinct principles in man. Against the notions and errors of the modern rationalists. Written originally in Latin by a person of quality; in answer to certain theses (drawn from Mr. Lockes principles) concerning faith and reason. With a new preface concerning reason, philosophy, morality & religion. London: printed for Ben. Cowse. 1713. lxxvi, 259, [1] p. 12o.; also published: London: printed for B. Cowse, 1713. Reprinted and sold by Sammells and Ritchie; sold also by J. Denis, 1737. [2], xl, 168 p. 12o. Written by Baron Wolf von Metternich; the work is described in: Fides et ratio, the book which introduced Jacob Boehme to William Law / Stephen Hobhouse. // IN: Journal of theological studies. 37 (1936):350-368. Discussed in Jägers Judicium since affectu (1708), which attributes the work to its editor, Pierre Poiret; and S. Hobhouse, Fides et ratio (1936) C 127; Y&Y 1708.5, 1713.1; A [483] Reasonableness of assenting to the mysteries of Christianity asserted and vindicated. With some remarks upon a book entituld, An essay concerning the use of reason in propositions, the evidence whereof depends upon human testimony. In a letter to a friend. London, printed for John Wyat. 1708. 81,[7]p. 8o. See p. 34, 37; an attack on Collinss Essay (1707) A [481] 1709An essay towards a new theory of vision. By George Berkeley Dublin: printed by Aaron Rhames, for Jeremy Pepyat, 1709. xiv, [10], 187, [1] p. 8o. Spinoza revivd: or, A treatise, proving the book entitled, The rights of the Christian Church, &c. (in the most notorious parts of it) to be the same with Spinozas Rights of the Christian clergy, &c. And that both of them are grounded upon downright atheism. To which is added, a preliminary discourse relating to the said books, by the Reverend Dr. George Hick[e]s. London: printed, and sold by J. Morphew. 1709. [72], 179, [1] p. 8o. See esp. p. [37-39] of Hickes preface. Reviewed by Le Clerc, Spinoza revived (1710); Carroll replied in Spinoza revivd. Part the second: or, A letter to M. Le Clerc London: printed, and sold by J. Morphew. 1711. 76 p. 8o. Y&Y 1709.1, 1711.1; A [485] 1710A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge. Part I. Wherein the chief causes of error and difficulty in the sciences, with the grounds of scepticism, atheism, and irreligion, are inquird into. By George Berkeley Dublin: printed by Aaron Rhames, for Jeremy Pepyat, 1710. [2], iii, [3], 214 p. 8o. See esp. Introduction, sect. 7. The life and character of that eminent and learned prelate, the late Dr. Edw. Stillingfleet, Lord Bishop of Worcester. Together with some account of the works he has publishd. London, printed by J. Heptinstall, for Henry and George Mortlock, 1710. 149, [3] p. 8o. Includes an account of the controversy with Locke (p. 86-90) A [486] Lexicon technicum: or, An universal English dictionary of arts and sciences: explaining not only the terms of art, but the arts themselves. Vol. II. By John Harris. London, printed for Dan. Brown, Tim. Goodwin, J. Walthoe, Joh. Nicholson, Benj. Tooke, Dan. Midwinter, M. Atkins, and T. Ward. 1710. 2o. Vol. 2 is actually a new and expanded edition of the original volume; see entries for Idea and Innate principles. Spinoza revived [review]. // IN: Bibliothèque choisie, pour servir de suite à la Bibliothéque universelle. Par Jean Le Clerc. Année 1710. Tome 21:36-47. Review of Carroll, Spinoza revivd (1709) 1711Syntagma theologico-physico-metaphysicum, complectens Compendium theologiæ naturalis; Paraphrasin in principia philosophiæ Renati Des-Cartes; ut & Dissertationum philosophicarum heptada. Autore Ruardo Andala Franequeræ, apud Wibium Bleck, bibliopolam. 1711. [16], 224, [4], 291, [1], 292 p. 4o. The existence of human soul after death: proved from Scripture, reason, and philosophy. Wherein Mr. Locks notion, that understanding may be given to matter and all other such books and opinions, are briefly and plainly confuted By Benj. Hampton London: printed for S. Popping, 1711. [2], ii, 44 p. 4o. C 128; Y&Y 1711.2; A [487] The resurrection of the same body. A sermon preachd before the University of Oxford, at St. Mary's, on Easter-Monday, Apr. 2. 1711. By Will. Lupton Oxford, printed at the Theatre for John Wilmot, and are to be sold by James Knapton and J. Morphew, booksellers in London. [1711]. 30, [2] p. 8o. C 128; Y&Y 1711.3; A [488] [Shaftesbury, A., 3rd Earl of.] Characteristicks, &c. Printed in the year 1711. 3 vol. 8o. Contains A letter concerning enthusiasm; Sensus communis, or an essay on the freedom of wit and humour; Soliloquy, or Advice to an author; An inquiry concerning virtue, or merit; The moralists; and Miscellaneous reflections on the preceding treatises, and other critical subjects. 1712A discourse concerning the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Together with an appendix concerning the impossible production of thought, from matter and motion: the nature of humane souls, and of brutes: By Humphrey Ditton London, printed by J. Darby and sold by A. Bell, 1712. xvi, 568 p. 8o. See the appendix (a refutation of Locke on thinking matter) Unverified; source: NUC A [489] The principles of natural philosophy, in which is shewn the insufficiency of the present systems, to give us any just account of that science: and the necessity there is of some new principles, in order to furnish us with a true and real knowledge of nature. By Robert Green Cambridge, printed at the University-Press, for Edm. Jeffery, and are to be sold by James Knapton and Benjamin Took, London, 1712. [70], 391, [1] p. 8o. 1714Io. Locki sublestas de ratione sententiae. Praeside M. Christlieb Gottwald Wabst Publice excutiet respondens Johannis Godofredus Schüler ad d. XX Octobr. MDCCXIV. Vitembergae, Formis Samuelis Kreusigii, [1714]. [16] p. 4o. C 107; Y&Y 1714.1 |