[ Table of Contents ]   [ Chapter 3: Philosophy ]

Thiel, U. (ed.)

Locke, epistemology and metaphysics / edited by Udo Thiel. – Aldershot, Hants, England ; Brookfield, VT : Ashgate : Dartmouth, ©2002. – xxii, 525 p. – (The international library of critical essays in the history of philosophy ; 1067)

Contents:


Acknowledgements   (p. vii-viii)

Series Preface   (p. ix)

Introduction   (p. xi-xxii)

Part I, Locke and the sceptical tradition

  1. Stephen Buckle (1999), “British sceptical realism : a fresh look at the British tradition,” European Journal of philosophy, 7:1-29   (p. 3-31)
  2. Daniel Carey (1997), “Locke as moral sceptic : innateness, diversity, and the reply to stoicism,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 79:292-309   (p. 33-50)

Part II, Innatism and the theory of ideas

  1. S.J. Winchester (1985), “Locke and the innatists,” History of philosophy quarterly, 2:411-420   (p. 53-62)
  2. M.A. Stewart (1979), “Locke’s mental atomism and the classification of ideas, I,” The Locke newsletter, 10:53-82   (p. 63-92)
  3. M.A. Stewart (1980), “Locke’s mental atomism and the classification of ideas, II,” The Locke newsletter, 11:25-62   (p. 93-130)
  4. David Soles (1999), Is Locke an imagist?” The Locke newsletter, 30:17-66   (p. 131-180)

Part III, Body and soul, will and desire

  1. Matthew Stuart (1998), “Locke on superaddition and mechanism,” British journal for the history of philosophy, 6:351-379   (p. 183-211)
  2. Laura Keating (1998), “Reconsidering the basis of Locke’s primary-secondary quality distinction,” British journal for the history of philosophy, 6:169-192   (p. 213-236)
  3. Garth Kemerling (1979), “Locke on the essence of the soul,” Southern journal of philosophy, 17:455-464   (p. 237-246)
  4. E.J. Lowe (1986), “Necessity and the will in Locke’s theory of action,” History of philosophy quarterly, 3:149-163   (p. 247-261)
  5. Tito Magri (2000), “Locke, suspension of desire, and the remote good,” British journal for the history of philosophy, 8:55-70   (p. 263-278)

Part IV, Substance, essence, and kinds

  1. Michael R. Ayers (1982), “Locke versus Aristotle on natural kinds,” The philosopher’s annual, 5:41-66   (p. 281-306)
  2. David Owen (1991), “Locke on real essence,” History of philosophy quarterly, 8:105-118   (p. 307-320)
  3. Jean-Michel Vienne (1993), “Locke on real essence and internal constitution,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 93:139-153   (p. 321-335)

Part V, Identity and persons

  1. Vere Chappell (1989), “Locke and relative identity,” History of philosophy quarterly, 6:69-83   (p. 339-353)
  2. Udo Thiel (1998), “Locke and eighteenth-century materialist conceptions of personal identity,” The Locke newsletter, 29:59-83   (p. 355-379)

Part VI, Language

  1. E.J. Ashworth (1981), “ ‘Do words signify ideas or things?’ : the scholastic sources of Locke’s theory of language,” Journal of the history of philosophy, 19:299-326   (p. 383-410)
  2. David E. Soles (1988), “Locke on ideas, words, and knowledge,” Revue internationale de philosophie, 42:150-172   (p. 411-434)
  3. Nicholas Unwin (1996), “Locke on language and real essences : a defense,” History of philosophy quarterly, 13:205-19   (p. 435-449)

Part VII, Knowledge and opinion, reason and faith

  1. Elliot D. Cohen (1984), “Reason and experience in Locke’s epistemology,” Philosophy and phenomenological research, 45:71-85   (p. 453-467)
  2. Predrag Cicovacki (1990), “Locke on mathematical knowledge,” Journal of the history of philosophy, 28:511-524   (p. 469-482)
  3. David C. Snyder (1986), “Faith and reason in Locke’s Essay,” Journal of the history of ideas, 47:197-213   (p. 483-500)
  4. Nicholas Wolterstorff (1990), “The assurance of faith,” Faith and philosophy, 7:396-417   (p. 501-522)