@article {602,
	title = {Land or plants: Agricultural tenure in agroforestry systems},
	journal = {Economic Botany},
	volume = {41},
	year = {1987},
	month = {April-June 1987},
	pages = {312-322},
	abstract = {The distinction between the rights to land and rights to plants is often overlooked when viewing agricultural tenure in developing countries. This distinction is crucial to understanding traditional agricultural systems, especially where agroforestry is practiced or its introduction has been proposed. Rights to land versus rights to plants are viewed in two Asia-Pacific agroforestry systems: one in Indonesian Borneo and the other in Papua New Guinea. Conflicts are discussed between the traditional dichotomy of land and plant rights and government policy. The success of an indigenous agroforestry system based on plant rights is contrasted to the failure of a proposed agroforestry system for similar reasons. It is concluded that the perceptual separation of land and plant rights needs to be explored if agroforestry practices are not only to be ecologically and economically feasible but also culturally acceptable.},
	keywords = {Borneo, Indonesia, land tenure, Melanesia, Papua New Guinea},
	doi = {10.1007/BF02858978},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/4254970},
	author = {J. A. Weinstock and N. T. Vergara}
}
@article {510,
	title = {Alternate cycle agroforestry},
	journal = {Agroforestry Systems},
	volume = {3},
	year = {1985},
	month = {December 1985},
	pages = {387-397},
	abstract = {Agroforestry research and design has heavily favored intergrated production of annuals and perennials, that is production of tree crops on the same parcel of land and at the same time as production of food crop annuals. For areas having high population densities and intensive modes of agricultural production, integral agroforestry may be appropriate, but for areas of sparse population where extensive agriculture is practiced or marginal hill lands, alternate cycle agroforestry may prove more suitable. Alternate cycle agroforestry, in the form of modified forest swidden systems, is discussed and compared to integral agroforestry systems. Advantages and disadvantages of each system are discussed relative to their use on marginal hill and forest lands.},
	keywords = {agroforestry, alternate cycle production, integral production, intercropping, marginal lands, swiddens},
	doi = {10.1007/BF00055720},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055720},
	author = {Joseph A. Weinstock}
}
@article {642,
	title = {Rattan: Ecological balance in a Borneo rainforest swidden},
	journal = {Economic Botany},
	volume = {37},
	year = {1983},
	month = {Jan.-March 1983},
	pages = {58-68},
	abstract = {Various agricultural startegies have been tried in swidden areas of tropical rainforest. Some have focused on food production, others on cash crops. Certain strategies have disrupted the ecological balance of the rainforest, while others developed with ecological stability in mind, but rarely have food production and cash cropping been coterminous and maintained ecological stability. Rattan in tropical rainforest swidden of southeastern Boreno is an indigenous system of producing both food and a cash crop without ecological disruption.},
	keywords = {Borneo, economic botany, food crop production, rattan, split rattan, swiddens},
	doi = {10.1007/BF02859305},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/4254455},
	author = {Joseph A. Weinstock}
}
