@book {346, title = {Indigenous knowledge and sustainable development in the Philippines: Proceedings of a workshop held at the International Institute of Rural Reconstruction, June 24-26, 1992}, year = {1994}, note = {Co-published by the Regional Program for the Promotion of Indigenous Knowledge in Asia (REPPIKA) and the Philippine Resource Center for Sustainable Development and Indigenous Knowledge (PHIRCSDIK). General Note: Jointly funded by the International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR), Foundation for Philippine Environment (FPE), Ford Foundation (FF), and User{\textquoteright}s Perspective With Agricultural Research and Development (UPWARD) Bibliography note: Includes bibliographical references Collection title: CIKARD-Center for Indigenous Knowledge in Agriculture and Rural Development. Department of Anthropology, Iowa State University}, month = {June 24-26, 1992}, pages = {164 pp.}, publisher = {International Institute of Rural Reconstruction}, organization = {International Institute of Rural Reconstruction}, address = {Silang, Cavite, Philippines}, abstract = {

The conference topics covered include:

}, keywords = {applied folklore, community development, congresses, environmental aspects, indigenous peoples, Philippines, social life and customs, sustainable development}, isbn = {0-942717-48-1; 978-0-942717-48-8}, url = {http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/35776619}, author = {International Institute of Rural Reconstruction (IIRR) and Regional Program for the Promotion of Indigenous Knowledge in Asia and Philippine Resource Center for Sustainable Development and Indigenous Knowledge} } @book {354, title = {Intellectual property rights for indigenous peoples: A sourcebook}, year = {1994}, month = {1994}, publisher = {Society for Applied Anthropology}, organization = {Society for Applied Anthropology}, address = {Oklahoma City, OK}, abstract = {

Contains following papers:

}, keywords = {developing countries, ethnobotany, ethnopharmacology, indigenous peoples, intellectual property, Western hemisphere}, isbn = {978-0-9642023-0-6; 0-9642023-0-1}, url = {http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/224715051}, editor = {Thomas C. Greaves} } @book {314, title = {Developing a partnership of indigenous peoples, conservationists, and land use planners in Latin America}, series = {Policy, planning, and research working papers -- Environment (WPS 245)}, year = {1989}, note = {See also: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/500811468776777817/pdf/multi-page.pdf}, month = {October 1989}, pages = {96}, publisher = {Latin America and the Caribbean Technical Dept., World Bank}, organization = {Latin America and the Caribbean Technical Dept., World Bank}, address = {Washington, DC}, abstract = {Policy, Planning, and Research Working Papers - Environment Recommendations for working in partnership with indigenous peoples, recognizing their land rights, incorporating their environmental knowledge into wildlands and native area planning, and paying more serious attention to the economics and resource implications of local activities to harvest wild resources - especially in environmentally delicate areas such as tropical rainforests. The major finding of the report is that a fundamental shift (a paradigm shift in the language of the historian of science Thomas Kuhn) has started in the way in which the international conservation community has come to view the issue of planning in areas which are occupied and used by indigenous peoples. Under the traditional paradigm, represented by several National Parks, wildlife reserves and other types of protected areas where indigenous peoples have aboriginal claims, indigenous peoples are allowed to continue to occupy and use the resources of these areas but only so long as they use the natural resources sustainably. This use, agreed with the park authorities, should reconcile the needs of both the indigenous peoples and the conservationists. Experience has found that these needs can be reconciled and made compatible, although this is far from being routine. Clearly major deforestation or firearm hunting for commerce by indigenous peoples are not compatible with wildlands protection. Where indigenous people and park authorities do not agree, then either the park or the people are encouraged to move. (author)}, keywords = {ache, acquatic resources, agriculture, Alaska Whaling Commission, Amboseli National Park, animal protection, Annapurna Conservation Project, aquaculture, Arctic Research Establishment, Aripuana Indian Park, Australia, Awa Ethnic Forest Reserve, Beni Biosphere Reserve, Bolivia, Brazil, Caribou Management Boards, Chile, Coburg National Park, Colombia, Conservation of natural resources, Costa Rica, Cuyabeno, Darien Biosphere Reserve, economic conditions, ecosystem management, Ecuador, environmental policy, Eskimo Walrus Commission, ethnoecology, ethnology, forestry, Honduras, Huaorani, Indians of South America, indigenous peoples, Kakadu National Park, Kenya, Kuna Yala Project, La Amistad Biosphere Reserve, La Planada, Lake Titicaca National Reserve, land tenure, land use planning, Latin America, Lauca National Park, Makivik Research Center, Manu National Park, Mbaracayu Wildland Area, Mexico, national parks, Native Americans, Nepal, NGOs, non-governmental organizations, oil exploration, Pacaya Samira National Reserve, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, rainforests, Rio Platano Biosphere Reserve, Sian Ka{\textquoteright}an Biosphere Reserve, Sierra de Manantlan Biosphere Reserve, Siona-Secoya, sport hunting, subsistence economy, subsistence hunting, Tagaira, UNESCO , usufruct rights, wildlife , World Bank, Xingu National Park, Yanomami Indian Park, Yasuni National Park}, url = {http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/29810664}, author = {Peter Poole} }