@article {120,
	title = {Population allocation at the housing unit level: estimates around underground natural gas storage wells in PA, OH, NY, WV, MI, and CA},
	journal = {Environmental Health},
	volume = {18},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {58},
	publisher = {BioMed Central},
	abstract = {Background
Spatially accurate population data are critical for determining health impacts from many known risk factors. However, the utility of the increasing spatial resolution of disease mapping and environmental exposures is limited by the lack of receptor population data at similar sub-census block spatial scales.

Methods
Here we apply an innovative method (Population Allocation by Occupied Domicile Estimation {\textendash} ABODE) to disaggregate U.S. Census populations by allocating an average person per household to geospatially-identified residential housing units (RHU). We considered two possible sources of RHU location data: address point locations and building footprint centroids. We compared the performance of ABODE with the common proportional population allocation (PPA) method for estimating the nighttime residential populations within 200 m radii and setback areas (100 {\textendash} 300 ft) around active underground natural gas storage (UGS) wells (n = 9834) in six U.S. states.

Results
Address location data generally outperformed building footprint data in predicting total counts of census residential housing units, with correlations ranging from 0.67 to 0.81 at the census block level. Using residentially-sited addresses only, ABODE estimated upwards of 20,000 physical households with between 48,126 and 53,250 people living within 200 m of active UGS wells {\textendash} likely encompassing the size of a proposed UGS Wellhead Safety Zone. Across the 9834 active wells assessed, ABODE estimated between 5074 and 10,198 more people living in these areas compare to PPA, and the difference was significant at the individual well level (p = < 0.0001). By either population estimation method, OH exhibits a substantial degree of hyperlocal land use conflict between populations and UGS wells {\textendash} more so than other states assessed. In some rare cases, population estimates differed by more than 100 people for the small 200 m2 well-areas. ABODE{\textquoteright}s explicit accounting of physical households confirmed over 50\% of PPA predictions as false positives indicated by non-zero predictions in areas absent physical RHUs.

Conclusions
Compared to PPA {\textendash} in allocating identical population data at sub-census block spatial scales {\textendash}ABODE provides a more precise population at risk (PAR) estimate with higher confidence estimates of populations at greatest risk. 65\% of UGS wells occupy residential urban and suburban areas indicating the unique land use conflicts presented by UGS systems that likely continue to experience population encroachment. Overall, ABODE confirms tens of thousands of homes and residents are likely located within the proposed UGS Wellhead Safety Zone {\textendash} and in some cases within state{\textquoteright}s oil and gas well surface setback distances {\textendash} of active UGS wells.},
	keywords = {Environmental health, Oil and gas, Population at risk, Safety, Setbacks, U.S. Census, Underground natural gas storage},
	doi = {10.1186/s12940-019-0497-z},
	author = {Drew R. Michanowicz and Samuel R. Williams and Jonathan J. Buonocore and Sebastian T. Rowland and Katherine E. Konschnik and Shaun A. Goho and Aaron S. Bernstein}
}
