@inbook{bibcite_314, keywords = {Critique et interpr{\'e}tation}, author = {Cynthia Osowiec Ruoff}, editor = {Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka}, title = {Le V{\'e}ritable Saint Genest: Creativity and the Movement from the Profane to the Sacred}, year = {1994}, journal = {From the Sacred to the Divine. A New Phenomenological Approach}, volume = {43}, pages = {195-208}, publisher = {Kluwer, coll. {\guillemotleft} Analecta Husserliana {\guillemotright}}, address = {Dordrecht}, note = {
Inspir{\'e}e par quelques vagues notions (imaginatio creatrix\ ; homo creator) puis{\'e}es chez Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (Logos and Life, Book I\ : Creative Experience and the Critique of Reason, Kluwer, 1988) et par quelques r{\'e}f{\'e}rences {\`a} Mircea Eliade (The Sacred and the Profane, Harcourt, 1957), l\’auteure consid{\`e}re Le V{\'e}ritable Saint Genest comme \«\ a timeless call to spectators of any era to re-create their own life texts in a movement from the profane to the sacred\ \» (p.\ 106). Dans sa trag{\'e}die, Rotrou mettrait en question une esth{\'e}tique des r{\`e}gles, de la vraisemblance et de la raison, au profit d\’une mani{\`e}re d\’{\^e}tre illustr{\'e}e par \«\ an actor whose creativity is manifested in a spiritual quest sparked by his irrational passion and sense experience\ \» (p.\ 197). Genest exhorterait tous les spectateurs {\`a} r{\'e}pondre \«\ to their senses impressions now, to be inspired by his spiritual journey, and to re-create themselves to become Christians believers\ \» (p.\ 207).
Ce point de vue quelque peu discutable avait {\'e}t{\'e} exprim{\'e} dans la communication de l\&$\#$39;auteure au colloque \"Esth{\'e}tique baroque et creeation artistique\" (Cerisy-la-Salle, 13-20 juin 1991) :\ \«\ L\’art du com{\'e}dien\ : imagination cr{\'e}atrice et diversit{\'e}\ \», publi{\'e}e en 1998 dans Marlies Kronegger et Jean-Claude Vuillemin, {\'e}d., Esth{\'e}tique baroque et imagination cr{\'e}atrice (T{\"u}bingen, Gunter Narr Verlag, p.\ 205-218).
}, language = {Anglais}, }