@booklet {5601, title = {Towards a Liberal Utopia}, year = {2005}, note = {

2nd ed. London: Continuum/IEA The Institute for Economic Affairs, 2006.\ 

}, month = {2005}, publisher = {IEA The Institute of Economic Affairs}, address = {London}, abstract = {

Liberal in this case means \"free market\". The first part of the book, \"Times Future?\", is a series of essays describing how specific policy areas could be improved using market mechanisms. The result, although it is clear that many of the authors are uncomfortable with the word, would be a free market utopia. The essays are \"Health 2055\" by Tim Evans and Helen Evans (41-55/2nd ed. 11-21), \"Education Reclaimed\" by James Tooley (56-66/2nd ed. 22-30), \"Policing a Liberal Society\" (67-85/2nd ed. 31-44), \"Pension Provision in 2055\" by Philip Booth (86-98/2nd ed. 45-55), \"Social Security in a Free Society\" by David G. Green (99-107/2nd ed. 56-63), \"Limits on the Tax Burden\" by Tim Congdon (108-18/2nd ed. 64-71), \"Britain\&$\#$39;s Relationship with the European Union\" by Patrick Minford (119-27/2nd ed. 72-79), \"Regulating the Labour Market\" by J.R. Shackleton (128-43/2nd ed. 80-91), \"Free Trade: The Next Fifty Years\" by Razeen Sally (144-54/2nd ed. 92-100), \"Competition in Land Use Planning: An Agenda for the Twenty-first Century\" (155-65/2nd ed. 101-09), \"Beyond Kyoto: Real Solutions to Greenhouse Emissions From Developing Countries\" by Roger Bate and David Montgomery (166-86/2nd ed. 110-25), \"The Environment in 2055\" by Julian Morris (187-99/2nd ed. 126-36), \"Capitalism\" by David Henderson and Geoffrey Owen (200-11/2nd ed. 137-45), \"A Constitution for Liberty\" by John Meadowcraft (212-21/2nd ed. 146-53), and \"The Hayekian Future of Economic Methodology\" by Paul Ormerod (222-32/2nd ed. 154-61). The second part includes five essays on past activities of the IEA.

}, keywords = {Female author, Male author}, author = {Philip Booth} }